How much is your clinic losing to the lack of a proper inquiry-handling system?
The calculator shows the difference in patients and revenue per month and per year, with and without an optimised inquiry-handling system. See the bottom of this page for how the model was built and the research it rests on.
Your clinic
Clinic type
Medium practices (3–6 dentists) typically see 60–120 inbound contacts per day across all channels. → about 20 new-patient inquiries a day feed the funnel below
Typically 20–40% of all inbound calls are new-patient inquiries; the rest are existing patients, confirmations and admin
Industry benchmark: 32%
Industry benchmark: 35%
Industry benchmark: 86%
Industry benchmark: 50%
Used for the profit gap — direct cost of delivering the treatment
Patients who don't convert still pay for a consultation
Your potential vs current
Revenue Outlook
The funnel
Where patients leak out — month by month
Monthly revenue gap vs optimized system
50 197 €
Annual revenue gap (12 × monthly)
527 069 €
Monthly profit gap (after treatment costs)
33 787 €
Modeled monthly revenue (your inputs)
35 123 €
12‑month trajectory
Monthly revenue: current vs optimized
Blue = optimized funnel, ramping up over the first four months; grey = your current inputs. The annual figure assumes full optimization.
Annual revenue gap: 527 069 €
Current vs best-practice funnel
Effective yield (missed inquiries → paying patient)
Your effective yield is 10.2% versus an optimized funnel of 24.9%. The modeled gap is about 50 197 € per month (~527 069 € per year).
What the optimised system actually is
The optimised column is not a better clinic. It is the same clinic with the leaks closed — and across the four stages this calculator models, the difference between an average practice and a top one is almost entirely operational: who picks up the phone, how fast someone calls back, how many times they try, and whether the treatment plan is presented with the price already in hand.
The front of the funnel is decided by pickup and speed. Peerlogic recorded 38% of calls unanswered across 4,280 calls at 26 practices, and TrueLark’s 8M-conversation dataset puts 33% missed during business hours — 65% of them from prospective new patients. Response time does the rest: 17% of leads book inside the first minute and 55% inside five, MIT/InsideSales found a five-minute callback 21× more likely to qualify than one made at thirty minutes, and roughly 95% of leads that eventually convert are reached by the sixth attempt — though 44% of teams stop after the first.
The back half moves on process rather than speed. A Cochrane meta-analysis puts SMS reminders at RR 1.10 for attendance and finds them as effective as phone calls at 55–65% lower cost, while Henry Schein One’s 2026 Catalyst Index separates a 45% average case acceptance from 75% in the top decile — that gap driven by standardised treatment presentation and verified out-of-pocket figures placed in the clinician’s hands before the plan is discussed. Every one of those is a change to how the day runs, not to how much you spend on ads.
Which of these does your clinic already do?
Tick everything that is true today. Nothing is sent anywhere — the score is only for you.
Most of the gap above is still on the table
Almost everything on this list is a process change rather than a budget one. The first three items alone move the two stages the model is most sensitive to — answered calls and speed of callback.
How this calculator was built
The calculator is built on averaged data for the selected market — real price lists and industry studies we have collected and summarised. Call volume and the new-patient share are conservative estimates drawn from our work with clinics; the figures for missed calls, booking, show-up and treatment acceptance rest on the sources listed below. The optimised values are based on our own experience running these systems and on world-leading medical-market practice. Every field is editable so the numbers can reflect your clinic.
- Peerlogic — analysis of 4,280 calls across 26 practices: 38% unanswered, 25% new-patient booking rate (vendor data)
- Peerlogic — Dental Operating Standards 2026, benchmarks from 3,000+ practices (vendor data)
- Henry Schein One — 2026 Catalyst Index: 45% average case acceptance, top 10% ≈ 75% (vendor data, named report)
- International Journal of Dentistry (Wiley) — 14.3% no-show rate across N=7,379 visits (peer-reviewed)
- PeerJ — Predicting no-shows for dental appointments (peer-reviewed)
- TrueLark via Group Dentistry Now — 33% of calls missed, analysis of 8M conversations (vendor data)
- Our own analysis: how much revenue missed calls cost a clinic
Sources from call-tracking platforms are marked vendor data; academic sources are marked peer-reviewed.